Legal Opinion

Raker v. Service Life Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is an action, in five counts, to recover the amounts of premiums paid on life insurance policies. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff on all fiye counts of the petition. Defendant has appealed.

The policies Were not all issued to plaintiff, but one each to himself and four others, who applied for the insurance, received the policies and assigned their causes of action against the defendant to plaintiff. There is some dispute between the parties as to whether the various counts of the petition plead causes of action in tort based on fraud and deceit or to recover the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reliance Life Insurance v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. American Insurance v. NeibergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Harnickell v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Davis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. Bankers Life & Casualty CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Ætna Life Ins. v. MeynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. Bergerson v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Lincoln National Life Insurance v. SobelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance Co. v. KierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API