Davis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The first, second, and third headnotes do not require elaboration.
In considering such a case the question might arise as to whether a court of equity has jurisdiction of a suit seeking to cancel a life-insurance policy on the ground that it was obtained by fraud. The case was tried without written demurrer or other motion to test the sufficiency of the petition. Our Code (1910), § 4538, provides: “Equity will not take cognizance of a plain legal right, where an adequate and complete remedy is provided by law.” We do not decide this question, because it is not made in the case. We will,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Third National Bank v. Western & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. LadsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Pittsburgh Spring Co. v. Smith & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3Cited by16 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Maddox v. Life & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- National Accident & Health Insurance v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Grice v. GriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Twilley v. TwilleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.