Legal Opinion

Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance Co. v. Kier

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1956No. 22458PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BROADDUS, Judge.

Plaintiff sued defendant, H. L. Kier, for an alleged assessment of $42 and penalties of $4.48, arising from a policy of hail insurance issued by plaintiff company to defendant. Plaintiff also sought an attorney’s-fee of $35. There was a verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.

Defendant is a farmer. On May 13, 1943, a Mr. Worthington, an agent of plaintiff company, called on defendant and the latter signed an application for hail insurance in plaintiff company. The application stated: “This insurance is for a term of five crop seasons, from noon on the 13th…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. American Insurance v. NeibergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Steinberg v. Phœnix InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Faith v. Home Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. McHoney v. German InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Galemore v. HaleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API