Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Sterling Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1955No. 32959PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Was the United States a “country at war” on May 11, 1952 (during the Korean conflict), within the meaning of the terms of a life insurance policy?

The answer is to be found within the scope and meaning of the word “war.” Is it to be construed in its legal or technical sense, or is it to be given its ordinary meaning as used in common speech?

Such construction becomes important in four distinct situations which concern an insured in military service:

First: Where death occurs prior to the formal declaration of war, as, for example, during the attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7,1941; the official…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Western Reserve Life Insurance v. MeadowsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Beley v. Pennsylvania Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Kane v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Rosenau v. Idaho Mutual Benefit Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Langlas v. Iowa Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Town of Tieton v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Lawrence v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Selective Logging Co. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. National Indemnity Co. v. GiampapaWashington Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API