Legal Opinion
Rosenau v. Idaho Mutual Benefit Ass'n
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1944No. 7139PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDunlap, J.
Appellant issued its policy No. E48740, insuring the life of one of its members, Howard A. Rosenau, the son of respondents, in the sum of $1000.00. Respondents are named therein as beneficiaries. The policy contains this provision:
“This policy does not cover death, disability or other loss sustained while in military, naval, or air service of any country at war, except that should death, disability or other loss be sustained while the member is in such service, or within six months after the termination of such service, as a result of wounds, injuries or disease suffered or contracted while…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Brig Amy WarwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Stankus v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Watkins Ex Rel. Watkins v. Federal Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Sweaney & Smith Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Hamilton v. McClaughryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Casey v. Highlands InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Foremost Insurance v. PutzierIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Beley v. Pennsylvania Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. BennionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Langlas v. Iowa Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.