Legal Opinion
Mann v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 1992No. 22609PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant, Carolyn Mann, was injured in a two-car accident; the other car was driven by a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Officer. At the time of the accident, Mann was insured with respondent Farmers Insurance Exchange. Pursuant to a relevant Nevada statute, Mann could recover a maximum payment of $50,000.00 from the police officer/department.
Mann settled with the police officer/department for $35,000.00 and executed a release. Thereafter, she submitted a demand and proof of loss to Farmers in an attempt to recover underinsured motorist benefits. Farmers did not respond to this demand.…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Hamilton v. Farmers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- McDonald v. Republic-Franklin InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Lambert v. State FarmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by21 opinions
- Taylor v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Augustine v. SimonsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Gray v. Simonson Farmers Ins. ExcMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Curran v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.