Legal Opinion
Ricks v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 14, 1995No. 93-2545-JWLPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff, William T. Ricks, has sued his employer, Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”), for employment discrimination on the basis of an alleged disability and also on the basis of his age, in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Xerox has moved for summary judgment on both claims (Doc. #25). For the reasons set forth fully below, defendant’s motion is granted and plaintiffs claims are dismissed with prejudice.
I. Facts
The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLASHER COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Amego, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Alamo Rodriguez v. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003
- Hutchinson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Oswalt v. Sara Lee Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1995
- Fink v. KitzmanDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.