Timm v. Michigan Central Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Joseph. (Loveridge, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiff bases his right of recovery upon the negligence of defendant (1) in employing an incompetent and inexperienced fellow-servant, named Oldenberg, and assigning him to work with plaintiff without any instruction or training; (2) in purchasing and using a crooked railway tie.
Plaintiff and Oldenberg belonged to a section gang of four men, who were at the time engaged in loading ties, from a pile alongside the track onto a hand car. The men worked in pairs, one at each end of a tie, plaintiff and the section boss working together, and Oldenberg and the other man, named Miller. The load…
2Cited by6 opinions
- White v. Owosso Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Roepcke v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Morch v. Toledo, Saginaw & Muskegon Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Jackson v. Schillinger Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Wordorski v. Illinois Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.