Legal Opinion

White v. Owosso Sugar Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1907No. Docket No. 85PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Miner, J. Case by Robert White against the- Owosso Sugar Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a verdict of “no cause,” directed by the court, upon the conclusion of the testimony in a personal injury case. Briefly stated, the facts proven are, that he applied to the defendant for common labor at its factory, where he had worked before, and was told that he could have a job on the diffusion tanks. His duty in that regard was to open and close the doors of certain tanks, at proper intervals, and aid in the removal of their contents, which consisted of beet pulp. It is unnecessary to describe his duties at length. There was an apparatus in the factory for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swick v. Ætna Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bauer v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gavigan v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Nephew v. WhiteheadMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Roepcke v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Howe v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Sorenson v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Matson v. HinesMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Haskell v. L. H. Kurtz Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Swanson v. Miami Home Milk Producers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API