Legal Opinion

Roepcke v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. (Kinne, J.) Submitted on briefs January 19, 1894. Decided June 2, 1894. Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff was a member of one of defendant’s section gangs at Avork in the vicinity of Dexter. The defendant was engaged in the construction of a bridge and culvert, and for that purpose had hauled upon flat cars oak timbers from 30 to 40 feet long, and from 12 to 15 inches in diameter. Plaintiff was 19 years of age, and possessed of average intelligence. He had worked for the defendant two weeks in the fall of 1889, and íavo Aveeks in the spring of 1890, previous to the accident, which occurred on April 10. Aside from this, most of his'time appears to have been spent upon a farm. His Avork,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Timm v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rohan v. Detroit Racing AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Peckinpaugh v. H. W. Noble & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. White v. Owosso Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Waldron v. Drury's Van Lines, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Wordorski v. Illinois Steel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API