Legal Opinion

Bergstrom v. Palmetto Health Alliance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 30, 2002No. 3552PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

Tamera Bergstrom sued Palmetto Health Alliance (“the hospital”) alleging the hospital was negligent and committed the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress regarding her purported adoption in 1979. The hospital moved to dismiss the claims and filed a motion to cap the hospital’s liability at $100,000. The Circuit Court granted the hospital’s motion to dismiss the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim and the motion to cap damages to $100,000. The Circuit Court denied the hospital’s motion to dismiss the negligence claim.

At trial, the hospital moved for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ford v. HutsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Hanahan v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Rush v. BlanchardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Flateau v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Hurd v. Williamsburg CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Bergstrom v. Palmetto Health AllianceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Hurd v. Williamsburg CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API