Air Pollution Variance Bd. of Colo. v. Western Alfalfa Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
An inspector of a division of the. Colorado Department of Health entered the outdoor premises of respondent without its knowledge or consent. It was daylight and the inspector entered the yard to make a Ringelmann test 1 of plumes of smoke being emitted from' respondent’s chimneys. Since that time Colorado has. adopted a requirement for a seareh warrant for. violations of air quality standards. 2 At the time of the instant inspection the state law required nó warrant and none was sought. Indeed, the. inspector entered no part of respondent’s plant to make the inspection.
A federal Act under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Minnesota v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Jackie David MillerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.