Legal Opinion
Bradshaw v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 20, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0536PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Andrew E. Bradshaw filed a 24-count Complaint alleging that the defendant Office of the Architect of the Capitol, his former employer, violated the Congressional Accountability Act (“CAA”), 2 U.S.C. § 1301, et seq. as well as prohibitions against employment discrimination and retaliatory employment practices through interference with plaintiffs application for disability retirement, constructive discharge of the plaintiff from his employment, and creation of a hostile work environment. See Complaint (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 1, 2, 3.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Doe I v. Exxon Mobil CorpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Turner v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Rangel v. BoehnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Kabakova v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020