Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Oreck

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1946No. Crim. 2370PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Edward Greek and Ben Kuhl, together with two others, were charged by information with violating sections 337a, subdivisions 1, 2, 4 and 6, of the Penal Code. They were found guilty after a trial by jury. From the judgment of conviction and from the order denying their motion for a new trial they appeal.

Section 337a relates to “Pool-selling, bookmaking, bets and wagers. Penalty.” Subdivision 1 prohibits pool-selling or bookmaking; subdivision 2 prohibits the keeping of premises for the purpose of recording bets or wagers; subdivision 4 prohibits the recording of bets and wagers; while…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Ah Sin v. WittmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Williams v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. StecconeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Leo Vitello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Szadolci v. Hollywood Park Operating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API