Legal Opinion

Szadolci v. Hollywood Park Operating Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1993No. B063912PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORTEGA, Acting P. J.

We affirm the summary judgment granted in favor of defendants.

Background

James Farenbaugh went to Hollywood Park on June 14, 1989, and put down $4,860 on a “Pick-9” ticket. A Pick-9 requires the bettor to pick the winners of the nine races run that day. Picking all nine winners results in a large return.

But Farenbaugh had something else in mind. He cancelled the ticket and bribed the pari-mutuel clerk to let him keep the worthless ticket. Farenbaugh then set out to sell shares in the ticket to other patrons at the track. The record does not reveal whether this was an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Barnett v. Delta Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Bonus-Bilt, Inc. v. United Grocers, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Wiler v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Brundage v. HahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Mills v. Forestex Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Walker v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. PMC, Inc. v. Saban Entertainment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API