Legal Opinion

Kirshner v. Feigenbaum

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1944PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mb,. Justice Chambliss

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an action to recover possession of office space brought by Feigenbaum et al., lessor, against Kirshner, doing business as Kirshner Realty Company, occupying the premises under a lease executed in 1940'. The case was heard in the trial court on a stipulation of facts to ■which copies of the lease were attached as exhibits. The insistence of plaintiffs below was that the description contained in the lease was insufficient under the Statute of Frauds, Code Section 7831, the lease being for more than one year, and, therefore, void,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pursley v. HayesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Russell v. SweezeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Slater v. BreeseMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Atwater v. SchenckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Schultz v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baliles v. Cities Service Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ray v. WoosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Brister v. Estate of BrubakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  4. Parsons Et Ux. v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Bates v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API