Legal Opinion
Cheryl Perry Hill v. A-T-O, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 10, 1976No. 232, Docket 75-7295PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs appeal from two orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The first order, dated March 5, 1975, granted defendants leave to reargue a motion for summary judgment and upon reargument awarded summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. The second order, dated April 11, 1975, denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to reargue or reamend their amended complaint and General Rule 9(g) statement.
Plaintiffs’ class action1 was commenced in the district court on December 3, 1973 and alleges violations by defendants of the federal…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Rios v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- In re Visa Check/Mastermoney Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Diehl & Sons, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1976
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.