Legal Opinion
Michael A. Mulhall v. John Ashcroft, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 23, 2002No. 00-6634PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Michael A. Mulhall appeals the grant of summary judgment on his Title VII retaliation claim. On the merits, we find no error in the district court’s judgment with respect to Defendant Attorney General John Ashcroft because Mulhall failed to produce either direct or circumstantial evidence from which a reasonable factfinder could infer that his supervisors knew of his protected activity. However, we must remand so the district court may amend its order in the present case. Although Mulhall sued both the FBI and then-Attorney General Janet Reno in her…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Donald Abbott v. Crown Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Carrie Braun v. Ultimate JetchartersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Ronald Stephen Satterfield v. State of Tennessee, Renata E. Bluhm, M.D. And Occupatient Medical Services, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Faisal Khalaf v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Enrique Seoane-Vazquez v. The Ohio State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.