Visiting Nurse Ass'n v. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.
It seems so clear to us that the Gridley Company hired nursing service and not a nurse that there is no necessity for a detailed argument to sustain that view. Among some of the salient facts sustaining it are these: Miss Hers never talked with any member or officer of the Gridley Company before she went there to work; nothing was said between them as to hours of work or wages. She continued to be paid by the Visiting Nurse Association. It could discharge her. The Gridley Company could not. Miss Kowalke testified: “The choice of nurse was left entirely to the Visiting Nurse Association as to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cayll v. Waukesha Gas & Electric Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Madix v. Hochgreve Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by12 opinions
- Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Blessing v. T. Shriver and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Freeman v. Krause Milling Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Spodick v. Nash Motors Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Springfield Lumber, Feed & Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.