In re the Parentage of C.A.M.A.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
— Washington’s current third party visitation statute, RCW 26.09.240, requires a nonparent seeking visitation to show a significant relationship with the child by clear and convincing evidence, as necessary predicate, and allows a petition by a nonparent only in the circumstance that the child’s parent or parents have already commenced an action for dissolution of marriage, legal separation, or modification of a parenting plan. These essential conditions in the current statute distinguish it from that at issue in prior cases, In re Custody of Smith and *202Troxel v. Granville.1 Therefore, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Parentage of CAMAWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Appel v. AppelWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In re the Marriage of KatareCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- In re the Custody of A.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- In re the Custody of A.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005