Legal Opinion

In re the Parentage of C.A.M.A.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 17, 2004No. 51001-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

— Washington’s current third party visitation statute, RCW 26.09.240, requires a nonparent seeking visitation to show a significant relationship with the child by clear and convincing evidence, as necessary predicate, and allows a petition by a nonparent only in the circumstance that the child’s parent or parents have already commenced an action for dissolution of marriage, legal separation, or modification of a parenting plan. These essential conditions in the current statute distinguish it from that at issue in prior cases, In re Custody of Smith and *202Troxel v. Granville.1 Therefore, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Parentage of CAMAWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Appel v. AppelWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In re the Marriage of KatareCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. In re the Custody of A.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. In re the Custody of A.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API