In re the Custody of A.C.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Quinn-Brintnall, C.J.
— On October 6, 2005, Department II of the Washington Supreme Court granted Michael Cumming’s Petition for Review and remanded the matter to the Court of Appeals Division Two for reconsideration in light of In re Parentage of C.A.M.A., 154 Wn.2d 52, 109 P.3d 405 (2005). In that case, our Supreme Court held that RCW 26.09.240, the statute which provided third party visitation rights, is unconstitutional in its entirety. C.A.M.A., 154 Wn.2d at 70.
¶2 Our initial opinion in this case can be found at Cumming v. Cumming, 124 Wn. App. 846, 103 P.3d 226 (2004). In affirming the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re Parentage of CAMAWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Appel v. AppelWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In re the Parentage of C.A.M.A.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- In re the Custody of A.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greenback Beach & Boat Club, Inc. v. BunneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012