Legal Opinion
Weight v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided November 7, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-0925-APublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CACHERIS, District Judge.
This matter is before this court on the plaintiffs’ motion for remand and defendant Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.’s (“KHI”) motion to dismiss for insufficiency of service of process. For reasons set forth below, the court denies plaintiffs’ motion for remand and rules that KHI was properly served with process.
I
Background
On August 2, 1984, plaintiff, Christopher F. Weight filed his motion for judgment in the Circuit Court for the City of Alexandria. The plaintiff alleges negligence and breach of warranty for injuries sustained in a motorcycle…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ralph E. Vorhees, to His Own Use and to the Use of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Nancy Vorhees, His Wife v. Fischer & KreckeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Eisenberg v. Commercial Union Assurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Tyler v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Newport Components, Inc. v. NEC Home Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1987
- Lemme v. Wine of Japan Import, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Smith v. Dainichi Kinzoku Kogyo Co., Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1988
- Mommsen v. Toro Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.