Legal Opinion
Eisenberg v. Commercial Union Assurance Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 19, 1960PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Defendant moves for dismissal of this action on the ground that there is no diversity of citizenship between plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff is a citizen of New York. Defendant is a British corporation with its principal place of business in London. Defendant has many places of business in the United States but its principal one in the United States is in New York.
The question presented involves the interpretation of section 1332 of title 28 U.S.Code, as amended in 1958, which reads as follows:
Ҥ 1882. Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs
“(a) The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hughes v. United Engineers & Constructors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
3Cited by45 opinions
- Cabalceta v. Standard Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Clarkson Co. v. ShaheenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Danjaq, S.A. v. Pathe Communications Corporation Mgm-Pathe Communications Co. Tracinda Corporation Kirk Kerkorian Mgm/ua Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Martha Eck v. United Arab Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Clarkson Co., Ltd. v. ShaheenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.