Legal Opinion

United States v. Third National Bank of Nashville

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided November 22, 1966No. Civ. A. 3849PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM E. MILLER, Chief Judge.

This action was instituted August 10, 1964 by the United States, acting through the Department of Justice, under § 4 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 4, and § 15 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S. C.A. § 25, to enjoin the proposed merger of the Third National Bank in Nashville (Third National) and the Nashville Bank & Trust Company (Trust Company). Violations of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. J 1, and § 7 of the Clayton Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 18, were charged in the complaint. Acting pursuant to the Bank Merger Act of 1960, 12 U.S.C.A. § 1828(c), the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. Columbia Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of LexingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Crocker-Anglo National BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Third Nat. Bank in NashvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. Provident National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. United States v. Crocker-Anglo National BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1967
  4. United States v. First National Bank of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1970
  5. United States v. Idaho First National BankDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API