Legal Opinion

United States v. First National Bank of Maryland

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 13, 1970No. Civ. 19801PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

If one could say, with apologies to Miss Gertrude Stein, that a bank is a bank is a bank, or even that a branch is a branch is a branch, perhaps this civil antitrust case involving a proposed bank merger could be said .to pose issues basically legal rather than factual. Congress and the Supreme Court, it is true, have established broad legal guidelines for the separation of permitted and proscribed bank mergers. But in most antitrust eases, it is the facts which govern .the determination of whether or not there is a reasonable probability that the merger will…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. First City National Bank of HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
  3. Larry E. Clark and J. Elliott Knoll v. United Bank of Denver National Association, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. First National Bancorporation, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1971
  5. United States v. Idaho First National BankDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API