Legal Opinion

Paolucci v. Morgan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 2018No. 2017–P–0020PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThomas R. Wright, J.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Denise Paolucci, appeals the trial court's ruling granting summary judgment in favor of appellees, Timothy and Maren Morgan, as to all three claims in her complaint asserting that there are genuine issues of fact. We affirm.

{¶ 2} Appellees ("the Morgans") own a large horse farm in Streetsboro, Portage County, Ohio. The farm includes a pasture, the Morgans' home, and a seven-stall horse barn. Although the Morgans keep at least one of their horses in the barn, they rent the majority of the stalls to others and provide boarding services. Tim Morgan regularly feeds the horses,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Agricultural Ins. v. ConstantineOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Toledo's Great Eastern Shoppers City, Inc. v. Abde's Black Angus Steak House No. III, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Holeski v. LawrenceOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. David v. LoseOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. UrsoOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oko v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API