David v. Lose
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
When the plaintiff entrusted his mare to the defendants for breeding purposes and paid for this service, a bailment for hire was created. See 7 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d, Bailments, Sections 3 and 6. The bailee for hire is obligated by law to exercise ordinary care in the safekeeping of the bail- or’s property, e. g., Hotels Statler Co., Inc., v. Safier (1921), 103 Ohio St. 638. The bailee also promises to return the property undamaged upon the termination of the bailment, 8 American Jurisprudence 2d, Bailments, Section 164.
Therefore, the bailor can sue the bailee for breach of either duty, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Agricultural Ins. v. ConstantineOhio Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by28 opinions
- Collins v. Click Camera & Video, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Maloney v. General Tire Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1973
- Parrish v. MacHlanOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Pelmar USA, L.L.C. v. Mach. Exchange Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Garofoli v. Whiskey Island Partners, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.