Legal Opinion
Oko v. City of Cleveland
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 8, 2022No. 1:21-cv-02222Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Michael A. Oko, Case No. 1:21cv2222 Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER City of Cleveland, et al., MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendants Currently pending are pro se Plaintiff Michael A. Oko’s (1) Motion for Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 3); and (2) Motion for Writ of Possession (Doc. No. 4.) Defendants City of Cleveland and Michael Donegan filed a combined Brief in Opposition on April 22, 2022, to which Plaintiff responded on June 1, 2022. (Doc. Nos. 10, 12.) For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Motions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Philip D. Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Audi Ag and Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Bob D'amato, D/B/A Quattro EnthusiastsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Edward Abney, Barbara Allen, James Day, Robert Green, Delbert Jackson, James Pugh, Roger L. Thacker, and Daniel Hunter Webster v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.