Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Finnegan v. Dammann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1936PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

This action puts in question the power of the governor partially to veto the bill here involved. This requires the application to the facts here presented of the 1930 amendment to sec. 10, art. V, Const., which reads as follows:

“Appropriation bills may be approved in whole or in part by the governor, and the part approved shall become law, and the part objected to shall be returned in the same manner as provided for other bills.”

The bill in question was No. 312, S., and was published as ch. 546, Laws of 1935. Its title was as follows :

“An act to repeal section 194.03, subsections (4), (5),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. HolderMississippi Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Mills v. PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hunt v. CallaghanArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Regents of the State University v. Trapp, AuditorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DodsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  2. Flynn v. Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Senate v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. McAlpine v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Slama v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API