Legal Opinion
Donnell v. United States
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 22, 1993No. Civ. 93-20-P-CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
GENE CARTEE, Chief Judge.
In this two-count action, Plaintiffs, Daniel and Georgianna Donnell (“the Donnells”) seek both preliminary and permanent injunctions commanding Defendants, the Army Corps of Engineers (hereinafter “the Army Corps” or “the Government”), and its agents, to rescind its August and December 1992 orders commanding Plaintiffs to remove certain pilings from their wharf. Specifically, Count' I alleges that the Government’s orders that Plaintiffs remove certain pilings from their wharf in York Harbor violate the Administrative Procedure Act, 5…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ripplin Shoals Land Company, Llc v. United States Army Corps Of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Alameda Gateway, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1996
- CTC Communications Corp. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1999
- Ripplin Shoals Land Co. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Ripplin Shoals Land Co. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006