Legal Opinion

Trane Co. v. Nash Engineering Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 26, 1928No. 2181PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

In this patent infringement suit, the District Court (Morton, J.) held claims 2 and 11 of the Jennings reissue patent (No. 15,637, granted June 26, 1923) and claim 13 of the second Nash patent (No. 1,091,529, granted March 31, 1914) valid and infringed. The main issue is the validity of claim 2 of the Jennings patent, covering a combination of old elements for a wet vacuum pumping apparatus and reading:

“The combination, with the separating chamber of a vacuum steam-heating system, of a rotary gas pump employing water for its pumping action and having a rotor provided…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ric-Wil Co. v. E. B. Kaiser Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  2. Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Trico Products Corporation v. Apco-Mossberg CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
  4. Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. Co. v. David Buttrick Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
  5. G. H. Packwood Mfg. Co. v. St. Louis Janitor Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API