Legal Opinion

Bonnie-B Co. v. Giguet

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 17, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Bonnie-B Company, Incorporated, against Julien Giguet and another, for infringement of a patent. On rehearing and reargument on motion to dismiss the bill.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, District Judge.

“My invention” states the patentee, “relates to a veil adapted to be used by women to cover the face, or face and front hair, or face and hat, as the purpose of use may require.”' The patentee further states:
*273“I am aware that hair nets of textile material and provided with a circuitous ehistic cord substantially like the veil described by me have been used to confine the hair at the back of the head or on the top thereof; hut I believe that I ain the first to suggest the use of such nets as a veil is used over the face and head in position beneath the chin, and over the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Mallinson v. RyanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  3. Chinnock v. Paterson, P. & S. Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902
  4. Fowler v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  5. Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dubilier Condenser Corporation v. New York Coil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. Rubinstein v. Silex Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  3. Coca-Cola Co. v. Whistle Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1927
  4. Gatch Wire Goods Co. v. W. A. Laid-Law Wire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  5. I. P. Frink, Inc. v. EricksonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API