Legal Opinion

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Glidden Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 13, 1933No. 449PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This is the usual equity suit for the infringement of a patent for a product; that is, for a lacquer made of nitro-cellulose with oils and resins, and for articles coated with it. Infringement is conceded, but the judge declared all the claims invalid. To an understanding of the case a brief statement is necessary, which may be supplemented by resort to the opinion below. De Nemours & Co. v. Glidden Co. (D. C.) 1 F. Supp. 1007. The base of the lacquer in question is nitrocellulose, a derivative of cotton, which when dissolved in proper diluents may be sprayed or brushed…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schering Corporation v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Buono v. Yankee Maid Dress CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. Ruben Condenser Co. v. Aerovox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. American Safety Table Co. v. SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. Coltman v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API