Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Jameson

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1888No. 12416PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

The plaintiff claimed that the defendant held the title to certain real • property in trust for him, and he brought this action to have the trust declared and a conveyance enforced.

The material facts of the case, as shown by the evidence and found by the court, are substantially as follows:—

Mrs. Thompson owned two lots in East Los Angeles, and agreed to sell them to.the plaintiff for $950, $200 of the money to be paid on the execution of the deed, and the balance in one year thereafter, with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum. The plaintiff agreed to purchase…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sandfoss v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Millard v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Hidden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Hellman v. MessmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Somers v. OverhulserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moultrie v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Adams v. LambardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Levy v. RylandNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Camacho v. BalasquideSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
  5. Culver v. GrahamWyoming Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API