Legal Opinion

Pope v. Dykes

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1905PublishedCited by 13 opinions

FROM MARION. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Marion County.— T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

delivered tlie opinion of tlie Court.

This bill was preferred by complainants as citizens and taxpayers of Marion county, Tennessee, against the defendants, J. J. Dykes, Spencer Anderson, T. G. Garrett, and John Prater, composing a majority of the Marion county road improvement commission, and J. R. Pryor, county judge of said county, for the purpose of enjoining said commissioners, their engineer in chief, agent, or' contractors, from further working or building a certain mountain road from Inman to the Hamilton county line, and to restrain the county judge from paying out any of the road…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Patton v. ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Lindsay v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Colburn v. Mayor of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Parks v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  2. Wright v. Nashville Gas & Heating Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Badgett v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Knoxville Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Walldorf v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API