Legal Opinion

Walldorf v. City of Chattanooga

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1951PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buenbtt

The appellants (complainants below) filed the original bill in this cause as “citizens, taxpayers and registered, qualified voters of the City of Chattanooga, Tennessee”, against the City of Chattanooga and the Chattanooga Housing Authority (the individuals constituting the governing bodies of these two corporations). “The gist of the complaint set out in the bill was that by calling its action a ‘resolution’ instead of an ‘ordinance’ the City of Chattanooga circumvented the provisions of its charter which provide that no ordinance of the City shall go into effect for two weeks following its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Patton v. ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Knoxville Housing Authority, Inc. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Jared v. FitzgeraldTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Wright v. Nashville Gas & Heating Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Badgett v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Biltmore Hotel Court, Inc. v. City of Berry HillTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Inman v. BrockTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Senff v. City of ColumbiaTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Country Clubs, Inc. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API