Legal Opinion
Patton v. Chattanooga
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1901PublishedCited by 62 opinions
PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. Wm. S. Beabben, setting by interchange.
1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, C. J.
On the 20th of November, 1900, the Board of Aldermen of the city of Chattanooga passed the following ordinance:
“An ordinance granting T. S. Wilcox and associates the right to establish an electrical plant in the city of Chattanooga; to put up and maintain a telephone, telegraph and electrical exchange ; to erect poles, wires, cables, and all necessary devices, appliances and constructions, including the privilege of constructing underground conduits, and erecting, running, and maintaining underground wires; together with all necessary de*199vices and appliances for the conduct of a general…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Painter v. PainterOhio Supreme Court · 1849
- Dodge v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Searle v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Hesing v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by62 opinions
- Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
- Mayhew v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Owen of Georgia, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Shelby County Roy Nixon, Mayor of Shelby County Pidgeon-Thomas Iron Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Parks v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Bennett v. StuttsTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.