Legal Opinion

Luebken v. City of Hanover

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1930No. 28,987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiff sued the city of Hanover to recover for injuries sustained while employed in hauling sand and gravel to be spread on the city streets.

*444The city rented a small tract of ground for a gravel pit about, a mile and a half away. It employed workmen to remove the top layer of earth so as to uncover the sand and gravel. Then it offered work to all who chose to haul from the quarry. The pay was one dollar for 4,200 pounds, the workmen furnishing their own means of transportation.

Plaintiff was a farmer who had had considerable experience…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rush v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Kippes v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Lively v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Walker v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. AuerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Stolp v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Scott v. NormanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Blackmore v. AuerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API