Legal Opinion

Kippes v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 26, 1910PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

The appellant, who was the plaintiff below, averred in a petition filed by her against the appellee to recover damages for personal injuries, that she was injured by the negligence and carelessness of the' agents and employes of the city who were at the time engaged in flushing the streets with a hose that was.in such an unsafe and defective condition that it hurst and threw water upon her, thereby causing her to contract a severe cold that impaired her health.

In the third paragraph of its answer the appellee city alleged that the flusher referred…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Park Commissioner v. PrinzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Conelly v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Twyman's Admr. v. Board of CouncilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  4. Maydwell v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Haney v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Klepinger v. Bd. of Comm. Co. of MiamiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Niblock v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Klepinger v. Board of Comm.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Jones v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1925

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API