Legal Opinion

State v. Inkelaar

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 21, 2011No. 101,987PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

This is a direct appeal from Nathan Inkelaar s convictions for one count of rape, one count of aggravated indecent liberties with a child, one count of attempted aggravated indecent liberties with a child, and three counts of aggravated criminal sodomy. He argues: (1) The trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce K.S.A. 60-455 evidence of prior sexual abuse to show plan, intent, or absence of mistake or accident; (2) the prosecutor committed misconduct during cross-examination of the defendant’s brother; (3) the trial court…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. State v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API