Legal Opinion

Sweet v. Foust

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 1, 1982No. Civ. 3422PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellant, Sweet, awarding damages in the amount of $1,000.

Plaintiff's action alleged negligent and wanton injury arising from an automobile collision. Personal and property damage was claimed. No proper proof of property damage was made. The only proof of personal injury was for extended massage and adjustment treatment to plaintiff's back by a chiropractor. Some $1,800 was charged for such treatment. Though the charges were stipulated reasonable, there was lengthy examination of witnesses as to the necessity for them. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Union Springs Telephone Company v. GreenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  3. Grayson v. AlexanderCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Moody v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brannon v. WebsterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  2. Posey v. McCrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. White v. SearcyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. Hamrick v. DanielCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Lynch v. RowserCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API