Legal Opinion

Hamrick v. Daniel

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 11, 1984No. Civ. 3757PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is a suit for damages arising out of an automobile accident. Plaintiffs-appellants, Robert Hamrick and Mary Ann Hamrick, sought damages for negligence and wanton misconduct of defendant-appellee, Frank Gantt Daniel, Jr., in driving his automobile through an intersection without having the right-of-way. Plaintiffs allege that they suffered property damage to their vehicle, including damages for the loss of use of the vehicle during the ninety-three days elapsing between the date of the accident and the date of completion of repairs.

Mr. Hamrick, during in-chambers conference,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blount County v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Crommelin v. Montgomery Independent Telecasters, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Hicks v. HugginsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Union Springs Telephone Company v. GreenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  5. Sweet v. FoustCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hicks v. WestbrookCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  2. Clardy v. Royal Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Williamson v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Crick v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Delmore v. GonzalesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API