Legal Opinion

Brannon v. Webster

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 7, 1990No. Civ. 7098PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a denial of a motion for new trial on the grounds that the jury verdict was inadequate.

Tammy Brannon filed an action against Christopher Webster alleging that she sustained injuries in an automobile accident in which Webster's vehicle negligently struck from behind the vehicle Brannon was driving. Brannon claimed no property damages but sought $100,000 for medical expenses, lost wages, and for pain and suffering. A jury returned a verdict for Brannon on negligence and assessed damages against Webster of $907.14 plus court costs. Brannon's motion for a new trial was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashbee v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Blount Brothers Construction Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  3. Nemec v. HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Thompson v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. McCain v. Redman Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Smith v. DarringCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  2. Wells v. MohammadCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Bennich v. Kroger Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Vinzant v. HughesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Roszell v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API