Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Rowser

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 21, 1992No. 2900755PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joan Lynch filed this action against Kirk Rowser as a result of an automobile accident that occurred in October 1989. Following a jury trial, a verdict was returned for Lynch in the amount of $1,500. Lynch moved for a new trial, alleging inadequacy of damages. The motion was denied. Lynch appeals.

Lynch contends the jury erred in failing to award her actual damages incurred as a result of the accident. She further complains that the jury erred in failing to award compensation for her pain and suffering.

The record reflects that in October of 1989 Lynch was injured in an automobile accident with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nemec v. HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. Brannon v. WebsterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Sweet v. FoustCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nix v. KeyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Nix v. KeyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Tyree v. BerryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API