Legal Opinion

People v. Brooks

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1987No. Docket Nos. D003662, D004996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

—Joseph S. Brooks appeals from the judgment entered after he entered a negotiated guilty plea to unlawfully taking a vehicle. The prosecution dismissed a single count of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) 1 and enhancement allegations. Brooks challenges the denial of motions to withdraw his guilty plea and to dismiss the information pursuant to article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (the IAD), section 1389. We decide Brooks did not waive his right to assert a defense under the IAD. We conclude, however, Brooks’s efforts to request a speedy resolution of charges against…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. RhodenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. People v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. People v. DialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. People v. LavinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. State v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API