Legal Opinion

People v. Dial

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 2004No. C045211PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HULL, J.

The issue presented by this case is whether a defendant awaiting sentencing in California, but incarcerated in another state, was denied equal protection of the laws when he was not returned to California for sentencing upon request. (See U.S. Const., 14th Amend.; Cal. Const., art. I, § 7; id., art. IV, § 16.) We find no constitutional violation and affirm the judgment.

Facts and Proceedings

On May 22, 2000, defendant Larry Ray Dial, Sr., entered a negotiated plea of guilty to transporting methamphetamine during an incident that occurred on February 6, 2000. (Health & Saf. Code,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Hayes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. TravisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. People v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. WilenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. DescanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API