Legal Opinion

M. P. Moller, Inc. v. Mainker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1934No. Appeal, 7PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaffer,

This is an action of replevin for the recovery of a pipe organ and its accessories and attachments installed by plaintiff in a theater under a contract of lease. After the writ issued, defendant, The Pennsylvania Trust Company, gave a claim property bond. The case pro ceeded to trial and resulted in a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $5,000, upon which judgment was entered. The Pennsylvania Trust Company appeals.

When the facts are plainly and chronologically stated, the case almost decides itself. Defendant got more than it was entitled to in having a jury pass…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clayton v. LienhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Butts v. CruttendenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Smith's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  4. Hamilton's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Otis Elevator Co. v. Arey-Hauser Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Central Lithograph Co. v. Eatmor Chocolate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Heinz v. Ruffsdale Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API