Legal Opinion

Heinz v. Ruffsdale Distilling Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1936No. Appeal, 98PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is a proceeding in equity brought by the holder of a warehouse certificate issued April 25, 1918, by the Dillinger Distilling Company, of which the defendant is the successor, to compel the delivery of five barrels of Dillinger Pure Rye Whiskey. The certificate sets forth that the issuer of it has on storage in its warehouse five numbered barrels of whiskey which will be delivered on return of the certificate, payment of all taxes and charges due thereon, and storage at the rate of six cents the barrel per month. Defendant could not deliver the whiskey mentioned in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henes v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Webster's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. M. P. Moller, Inc. v. MainkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huffman Estate (No. 3)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Mullooly v. ShortSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API