Legal Opinion

Harpending v. Haight

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870No. 2,416PublishedCited by 63 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court in the exercise of original jurisdiction. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

The petitioner moves for a peremptory writ of mandamus to be directed to the respondent, commanding him, as Governor of the State, to cause to be authenticated as a statute *195a certain, bill now in his possession, known as Senate Bill No. 258, which passed both houses at the late session of the Legislature:

The case comes before us upon a voluntary submission made by the parties upon the following agreed statement of facts:

Now comes the petitioner and respondent, and, without action, agree upon the following facts, and submit the same to this Court for adjudication:

I. —That petitioner has such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Fowler v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  3. State ex rel. Whiteman v. ChaseOhio Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Middleton v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Chamberlain v. SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Slack v. JacobWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. City of Ensley v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Crenshaw v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API