Legal Opinion

Redmond v. Ray

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 26, 1978No. 61602PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

We must here construe and apply la. Const. Art. Ill § 16 which provides the Governor’s veto power. Plaintiffs Redmond and Willits are state senators. They allege Senate File 7 (SF 7), passed by the Sixty-seventh General Assembly, became law at midnight on June 3,1977, because of defendant Governor Ray’s failure to act upon it within three days of its May 81, 1977, submission to him. The trial court entered a declaratory judgment that under Art. Ill, § 16 the Governor had three calendar days, Sunday excepted, from the date of submission within which to veto the bill. Because…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. The Pocket Veto CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Edward M. Kennedy v. Arthur F. Sampson, Acting Administrator, General Services Administration, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. Wright v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. City of Waterloo v. SeldenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  5. Harpending v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. GroffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. State v. NevilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Amended August 21, 2014 Ned Chiodo v. The Section 43.24 Panel Consisting of: Secretary of State Matthew Schultz, Auditor of State Mary Mosiman and Attorney General Thomas MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  5. Rants v. VilsackSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API